The situation surrounding Tyree Smith’s conditional release has sparked significant controversy and public debate in Connecticut. Smith, who was acquitted of the 2011 murder of Angel Gonzalez due to mental illness, has been living in the community for several months as part of a treatment plan following his 2013 conviction for the killing.
The decision by the Psychiatric Security Review Board (PSRB) to approve his move from temporary leave to conditional release has raised concerns about public safety, particularly from the victim’s family and some lawmakers.
On one hand, Smith’s treatment team has reported positive progress, with his schizophrenia in remission, full compliance with medication, and active participation in therapeutic programs.
His mental health professionals and family are hopeful about his reintegration into society, pointing to his remorse for the crime and his commitment to treatment.
On the other hand, critics argue that allowing someone who committed such a violent crime to live freely, even with monitoring, is too risky. Family members of the victim, as well as lawmakers like Republican Rep. Devin Carney, argue that the potential for reoffending remains high, especially if Smith were to stop taking his medication.
The case underscores the complex balance that the PSRB must strike between ensuring public safety and respecting the rehabilitation and rights of those acquitted due to mental illness.
While Smith’s progress in treatment is acknowledged, the lingering fear about his past actions and the potential for relapse reflects the deep anxiety that accompanies these decisions.
It’s a difficult challenge for lawmakers and mental health professionals, as this case could prompt future legislative reforms regarding the standards for release of individuals with similar diagnoses.